After a lengthy legal battle and billion-dollar loss, 'Fortnite' is back on iOS

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iOS edited May 20

Over four years after Epic broke App Store rules and sparked a billion-dollar battle, "Fortnite" is finally back on iPhone and iPad.

Four colorful Fortnite characters, including a person in a bear costume and a LEGO figure, surround the bold 'Fortnite' text with streaks of light and a speeding car.
'Fortnite' returns to the US App Store



For those who have missed playing Fortnite on iPhone and iPad, today's your lucky day: it's back on the App Store. After successfully passing its review in early May, the game has been cleared by Apple and made available to players once more.

It's been four years since Fortnite was last available on iOS. In the summer of 2020, Epic willingly violated Apple's App Store rules by allowing players the option to purchase Fortnite's in-game currency directly from Epic.

The move was done to avoid the 30% fee Apple charged on in-app purchases. Of course, it was also a publicity stunt.



This violation not only resulted in the game's removal from the App Store, it kicked off a lengthy legal battle between the two tech giants. The lawsuit concluded with Epic being found guilty of violations, but it was also determined that Apple's anti-steering provisions in the App Store were not entirely legal.

Epic may have claimed a moral victory, but it's still unclear who actually won. What is clear is that the fight emptied more than $1 billion from Epic's coffers.

Buying V-Bucks in "Fortnite"



After installing the game and signing in, you're greeted with the main Fortnite page to join a game. Going to the V-Bucks menu shows a few simple choices you'd expect from a game with its own currency, like bonus coins for spending more.

Options to purchase 1,000 V-Bucks for $8.99 using Epic Games Store or in-app purchase, with a cancel button.
Epic isn't pushy about its external link



It isn't until you choose an amount and tap purchase that you're faced with a decision. Both buttons for the Epic Games external link and the in-app purchase are identical in size.

There are no warnings about Epic owing Apple money or charging more for in-app purchase. It seems the only incentive offered is a bonus 20% in Epic Rewards by choosing the external link.

Get Fortnite as a free download from the App Store.



Read on AppleInsider

«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 36
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.
    neoncatdewmelongfangnubusteejay2012mike1sirdirwilliamlondonjibstuke
     3Likes 9Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 36
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,836member
    I can't see it on Canada's app store. I wanted to read its privacy information. "This app is currently not available in your country or region."
    edited May 20
    teejay20129secondkox2
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 36
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 
    mdwnubuswdowelldebonbon9secondkox2elijahgjbdragon
     1Like 6Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 36
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 
    Because I can now circumvent the App store as save money buying direct? This is actual freedom. 
    neoncatmdwlongfangCheeseFreezenubussconosciutowdowelldebonbonteejay2012danox
     6Likes 14Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 36
    neoncatneoncat Posts: 190member
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 
    omg the performative Apple sycophant drama surrounding this whole saga is easily the most insufferable part, even more than either of the Tim’s posturing. 
    nubussconosciutodebonbonteejay2012danoxigorskybshankmike1williamlondonelijahg
     5Likes 6Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 36
    mikethemartianmikethemartian Posts: 1,684member
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 
    That’s over the top.
    sconosciutodebonbonigorskywilliamlondonzeus423jbdragon
     5Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 36
    CheeseFreezecheesefreeze Posts: 1,420member
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.

    Saying Apple deserves a 30% cut of all digital goods because they built the platform is like saying a mall owner deserves a percentage of everything sold in every store, forever, even after the store builds its own loyal customer base and no longer relies on foot traffic.

    Sure, Apple built the “mall” - the App Store - and they deserve fair rent for access and discovery. But when Apple blocks tenants from even telling customers that cheaper options exist outside the mall, or forces them to use Apple’s own checkout system, it stops being about fair business and becomes about control.

    The real issue isn’t whether Apple should earn money - they already do, handsomely. It’s that they’ve positioned themselves as landlord, tax authority, and competitor all at once. Epic’s win doesn’t mean developers escape costs - it just means they can finally choose how to run their businesses. That’s not freeloading. That’s competition.

    And let’s be honest: a free economy isn’t absolute. It needs guardrails. When two companies are the app economy, protecting free markets requires regulation - not just to stop abuse, but to keep the system open for the next generation of creators.

    teejay2012danoxdavenwilliamlondonjibAlex1NstukeelijahgtrainMan83Whizville
     2Likes 9Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 36
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,280member
    Tried FartNite once... and have never seen an app cajole users more to spend, spend, spend. 
    sconosciutoigorskydavenwilliamlondonjibtrainMan83jbdragon
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 36
    wdowellwdowell Posts: 238member
    "it was also determined that Apple's anti-steering provisions in the App Store were not entirely legal"

    You can remove the word 'entirely' as it's superfluous !
    edited May 21
    igorskyddawson100neoncatdavenjibelijahgtrainMan83
     3Likes 4Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 36
    saareksaarek Posts: 1,622member
    Reading through some of the court notes and witness statements, it does seem that Phil Schiller is about the only person coming through from this with a good reputation in tact. Everyone else, both from Apple and Epic just come off as placing greed above all else.

    Apple should have dropped the 30% fee to a much more reasonable amount years ago. They get to triple dip at the moment, to develp iOS apps one needs to own a Mac, then they sell the iDevices to customers with margins that'd make a harlot blush and finally they exact a 30% toll for all software sold on iOS. They seem to forget that developers are also customers and that fleecing them for all they can get should not be the primary objective.

    Don't get me wrong, Epic's Sweeney is no shining white knight figure here, he is a total arsehole. But everyone else, excluding Phil Schiller, also look like total money grabbing scum bags.

    A really bad look for Apple and a sign that they have lost their moral compass.
    edited May 21
    neoncatwilliamlondonjibAlex1NelijahgtrainMan83
     4Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 36
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.

    Saying Apple deserves a 30% cut of all digital goods because they built the platform is like saying a mall owner deserves a percentage of everything sold in every store, forever, even after the store builds its own loyal customer base and no longer relies on foot traffic.

    Sure, Apple built the “mall” - the App Store - and they deserve fair rent for access and discovery. But when Apple blocks tenants from even telling customers that cheaper options exist outside the mall, or forces them to use Apple’s own checkout system, it stops being about fair business and becomes about control.

    The real issue isn’t whether Apple should earn money - they already do, handsomely. It’s that they’ve positioned themselves as landlord, tax authority, and competitor all at once. Epic’s win doesn’t mean developers escape costs - it just means they can finally choose how to run their businesses. That’s not freeloading. That’s competition.

    And let’s be honest: a free economy isn’t absolute. It needs guardrails. When two companies are the app economy, protecting free markets requires regulation - not just to stop abuse, but to keep the system open for the next generation of creators.

    I totally agree with you. I think you missed the irony in my second sentence :) 
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 36
    igorskyigorsky Posts: 792member
    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.
    He would have if he owned the toll road. 
    jfabula1knoxDavidwilliamlondonjibAlex1Nroundaboutnowzeus423jbdragon
     7Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 36
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,808member
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 

    What’s gonna be sad for the average developer going forward is that Xcode (and all those other tools) will not be cheap/free anymore all those developer tools that Apple has given away will over time will start to cost real money up front a la like the good old days you know those two grand software developer packs. 

    The big companies never cared about the small fry developer (as portrayed Sweeney Todd) its like saying, Elon cares he doesn’t refer to the way Adobe is behaving now with their new subscription plan, what is funny is all of the software companies who think they’re gonna have a subscription here and a subscription there similar to the way all those tv/video/movie production houses, cable internet/channels (including Apple) thought there was a pot of gold with endless subscriptions but there is a finite limitation for the average person/family. 

    The mark/customer doesn’t have a source of endless monetary resources to have 20 monthly subscriptions going at the same time, we may be headed back to the good old days where you bought something upfront once and that’s it, I have four subscriptions, Netflix, PBS, Apple and BritBox that’s it and there will be no more than that how many do you have? And that number is across all content mediums, video, music, software yep-that’s it just four….

    edited May 21
    neoncatdavenAlex1NtrainMan83jbdragon
     4Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 36
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,496member
    It’s a sad day for freedom. 

    I really wish this was the saddest thing for freedom this year, month, week or even today.
    randominternetpersonelijahgtrainMan83
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 36
    davendaven Posts: 771member
    So Epic is now hosting third party add ons on their website for free?
    foregoneconclusionwilliamlondonAlex1Nroundaboutnowzeus423
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 36
    davendaven Posts: 771member
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.

    Saying Apple deserves a 30% cut of all digital goods because they built the platform is like saying a mall owner deserves a percentage of everything sold in every store, forever, even after the store builds its own loyal customer base and no longer relies on foot traffic.

    Sure, Apple built the “mall” - the App Store - and they deserve fair rent for access and discovery. But when Apple blocks tenants from even telling customers that cheaper options exist outside the mall, or forces them to use Apple’s own checkout system, it stops being about fair business and becomes about control.

    The real issue isn’t whether Apple should earn money - they already do, handsomely. It’s that they’ve positioned themselves as landlord, tax authority, and competitor all at once. Epic’s win doesn’t mean developers escape costs - it just means they can finally choose how to run their businesses. That’s not freeloading. That’s competition.

    And let’s be honest: a free economy isn’t absolute. It needs guardrails. When two companies are the app economy, protecting free markets requires regulation - not just to stop abuse, but to keep the system open for the next generation of creators.

    So you are saying I can set up my product booth in Walmart and let people buy my product on the spot directly from me or go outside and pay there without Walmart getting a cut or being able to object. Likewise, if I’m a developer of third party add ons to Epic’s games, they need to host and let me sell my add ons on their website without a cut of my sales.
    danoxwilliamlondonAlex1NtrainMan83roundaboutnowzeus423jbdragon
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 36
    Snorplesnorple Posts: 1member
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.

    Saying Apple deserves a 30% cut of all digital goods because they built the platform is like saying a mall owner deserves a percentage of everything sold in every store, forever, even after the store builds its own loyal customer base and no longer relies on foot traffic.

    Sure, Apple built the “mall” - the App Store - and they deserve fair rent for access and discovery. But when Apple blocks tenants from even telling customers that cheaper options exist outside the mall, or forces them to use Apple’s own checkout system, it stops being about fair business and becomes about control.

    The real issue isn’t whether Apple should earn money - they already do, handsomely. It’s that they’ve positioned themselves as landlord, tax authority, and competitor all at once. Epic’s win doesn’t mean developers escape costs - it just means they can finally choose how to run their businesses. That’s not freeloading. That’s competition.

    And let’s be honest: a free economy isn’t absolute. It needs guardrails. When two companies are the app economy, protecting free markets requires regulation - not just to stop abuse, but to keep the system open for the next generation of creators.

    Hate to break it to you, but malls do charge stores for a percentage of their revenue.  Yes, it's more complicated than that, but it's a standard part of a retail lease.  If they run a business out of the mall store, then they typically pay a percent of the revenue generated out of that store (be it baked in as a fixed lease with a break point, or a flat out minimal fixed lease with a percentage of revenue on top).  The stores don't pay for sales outside of that mall store, and neither do the developers on Apple's ecosystem.  If developers have customers purchase items outside of the app, then they've bypassed the 15% or 30% fee and used their own payment system.  This is how Kindle and the major streaming services work (or worked).  

    The bigger question Apple should be thinking about is not defending the current system they're using, but to recognize that it's a mature system and their monetization method should be rethought.  They are entitled to recouping their costs and generating a profit.  That's just business.   
    danoxwilliamlondonjibAlex1NelijahgtrainMan83roundaboutnow
     7Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 36
    saarek said:

    A really bad look for Apple and a sign that they have lost their moral compass.
    Based on your objections, it's not at all clear when Apple had a moral compass that you would approve of. Steve Jobs defended Apple's financial interests even more aggressively than the current leadership.
    trainMan83zeus423
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 36
    vztrv1vztrv1 Posts: 26member
    Did Apple still put a disclaimer screen when going to the outside system ?  I gather the “scare screen” was an issue but it seems legit to let the purchaser know that any dispute should be with the developer and not Apple. 
    Alex1NtrainMan83zeus423
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 36
    sirdirsirdir Posts: 212member
    "we love developers" as long as we get a 30% cut.

    Just because Karl Benz invented the automobile doesn't mean he gets a cut of every toll road.
    This and as long as they stick to arbitrary rules that Apple themselves ignore as they seem fit. I’m looking forward to every fine they’ll get. It’s sad they don’t even notice they’ve destroyed innovation on the other platforms like iPad, Vision Pro etc with their dictatorship.
    williamlondon9secondkox2trainMan83roundaboutnowmike1zeus423
     0Likes 6Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.